Start a new topic

Banned for Using PAID Emotes? Unbelievable!

I never thought I’d see the day when Risk: Global Domination would punish players for using the very features they sell. But here I am, banned for a MONTH simply because some salty players couldn’t handle losing.


Let’s get this straight: I paid for premium emotes—features that the game itself offers as part of its monetization. I used them as intended. And what happened? Some sore losers, instead of taking their defeat with dignity, decided to abuse the report system to get me banned. This isn’t about "toxic behavior"—this is about players weaponizing the ban system to punish others for playing the game better than them.


If using a paid feature can get you banned, then why even sell it in the first place? Are we just supposed to throw money at the game and be afraid to use what we paid for? This sets a dangerous precedent. What’s next? Bans for rolling too many sixes? Suspension for making smart alliances?


This needs to be addressed, and fast. If Risk wants to maintain any credibility, they need to fix their flawed reporting system. Otherwise, the message is clear: If you’re winning, watch out—because losing players have more power than you do.


SMG Studio, do better.


So here we are, a few days into my ridiculous one-month ban, and I can’t help but laugh at the state of this game. Risk: Global Domination—a game about STRATEGY, ALLIANCES, and OUTSMARTING your opponents—has now become a safe haven for sore losers who can’t handle reality.


Let’s talk about what really happened. I used a paid feature—a premium emote, something I spent real money on. Did I hack the game? No. Did I cheat? No. Did I harass anyone? Absolutely not. I did exactly what the developers intended: I used an in-game feature. But instead of playing the game like adults, my opponents—who couldn’t stand the fact that they got outplayed—decided to cry, hit the report button, and BAM: instant ban.


Now let’s get something straight. This isn’t about toxic behavior.

This is about a broken system where a group of salty players can weaponize the report function to silence anyone who outsmarts them.


 Here’s what needs to happen:


  • Fix the reporting system. Players shouldn’t get banned just because a group of losers decide to mass report them.
  • Clarify the rules. If using paid emotes is “toxic,” then WHY are they even in the game.
  • Reinstate banned players who did NOTHING wrong.

At this point, I’m not even mad anymore—I’m just entertained. Risk: Global Domination has officially transformed from a game of strategy into a circus of incompetence, where the real game isn’t about tactics or diplomacy, but about who can manipulate the broken system the best.


Let’s take a step back and look at the bigger picture, because my one-month ban for using a paid emote is just the tip of the iceberg. The game has far bigger problems, and SMG Studio is either asleep at the wheel or just doesn’t care.


The Report Abuse System is Out of Control

We’ve established that the report system is a joke. But this has been a problem for years. Any player with half a brain knows that all it takes is a handful of crybabies clicking "report," and suddenly you’re banned. No investigation. No appeals. Just instant punishment, even if you did nothing wrong.


What’s worse is that the system is completely inconsistent. You can get banned for an emote, but I’ve seen players outright cheat and nothing happens.


This is not a fair or reasonable system. It allows players who can’t handle losing to abuse the mechanics and punish others for simply playing well.


The Rise of Pay-to-Win Mechanics

Risk was once a game of strategy, reading your opponents, and executing the perfect attack. Now, the monetization model is creeping into pay-to-win territory.


Some players suspect that certain dice skins roll better than others. Is this proven? Not yet. But the fact that there is even a discussion about it shows how little trust people have in the game’s integrity.


New players are at a massive disadvantage because many of the best maps are locked behind a paywall. You can’t develop real strategic skills when you’re constantly stuck on basic maps while veterans dominate premium ones.


The ranked system has also become meaningless. It’s too easy to exploit by farming bots or playing with groups that boost each other. Climbing the ranks should be based on skill, not on who can manipulate the system the best.


The AI is Actively Working Against Good Players

The AI in this game is a disaster. Instead of behaving in a way that mimics real strategic play, it makes moves that seem deliberately designed to keep weaker players in the game.


AI will randomly attack the strongest player, even when it makes no strategic sense. It will form unofficial alliances with losing players, making it feel like you’re fighting against a scripted system rather than real opponents.


Players also exploit AI behavior to farm easy wins, creating an uneven playing field in ranked matches. When a game’s AI can be manipulated this easily, it stops being about skill and starts being about who knows how to exploit the flaws in the programming.


SMG Studio’s Complete Silence

What’s most frustrating is that SMG Studio refuses to address these problems. Instead of fixing their broken game, they just keep pumping out more microtransactions while ignoring real complaints.

  • Players constantly report cheaters, but nothing happens.
  • Bots are ruining games, but there are no fixes.
  • The report system is being abused, but there are no adjustments.


The game crashes and glitches, and players are expected to just deal with it.


But they’re still selling overpriced emotes, so at least they’re keeping their priorities straight, right?


Risk is Becoming a Joke

At this point, Risk: Global Domination isn’t a game of strategy anymore—it’s a game of survival against sore losers, rigged AI, and a broken moderation system.


If you’re a skilled player, you aren’t rewarded—you’re targeted. Either by mass reports from players who can’t handle losing, AI that sabotages your moves, or SMG Studio’s flawed banning system.


Until these issues are fixed, Risk isn’t a game of world domination. It’s a game of who can cry the loudest.


Fix your game, SMG Studio. Or watch real players leave while the sore losers take over.

Subject: Addressing Unjust Bans in Risk: Global Domination Dear SMG Studio Team, I am reaching out to bring attention to a recurring issue I have faced while playing Risk: Global Domination—unjust bans that seem to occur without clear justification. As an avid player who respects the rules and values the strategic depth of the game, these bans are both perplexing and disheartening. Lack of Transparency in Banning Process The primary concern lies in the lack of transparency surrounding the banning process. On several occasions, I have found myself banned without any clear explanation or evidence of wrongdoing. This lack of communication leaves players in the dark, unable to understand or rectify the situation. A more transparent process, where players are informed of the specific reasons for their bans, would greatly enhance trust and accountability. Need for a Robust Appeals System Currently, there appears to be no effective means to appeal these decisions. An appeals system that allows players to contest bans and present their case would be a valuable addition. This would not only ensure fairness but also provide players with the opportunity to clear their names if they believe a mistake has been made. Ensuring Fair Play for All While I understand the importance of maintaining a fair and respectful gaming environment, it is crucial that the systems in place do not inadvertently penalize players who are abiding by the rules. Ensuring that bans are based on concrete evidence and not on misunderstandings or errors is essential for maintaining the integrity of the game. Enhancing Player Support Improving player support by offering timely responses and resolutions to such issues would also contribute to a more positive gaming experience. Players should feel confident that their concerns are being heard and addressed in a fair manner. Conclusion Risk: Global Domination is a game that thrives on strategic thinking and fair competition. By addressing these concerns and implementing more transparent and fair processes, SMG Studio can enhance the experience for all players and foster a more engaged and satisfied community. Thank you for considering these suggestions. I am hopeful that together we can work towards a solution that benefits the entire Risk community. Sincerely, camerongerard7@gmail.com
Login or Signup to post a comment