That's what just happened to me Billy. Someone didn't confirm and they botted out.
Then at the end even though the bot literally had a 4-1 advantage in troops (roughly 80 to Orange's 20) and the bot controlled NA and SA the bot allowed Orange to take over Asia and Australia and HOLD Asia and Australia.
I mean....how hard is it to program AI in 5 years that KNOWS BASIC STRATEGY?
Earlier in the game the bot had just been fortifying when it could have taken over Africa too.
It's just ridiculous how bad the AI is.
Hey Eric....tell me the "rational explanation" for this:
I just lost a game where it came down to me, Orange and a bot.
Orange had about a 20 troop advantage over me and was about equal to the bot. So Orange (wisely) attacked me and he was down to about 20 troops, I was down to 1 troop and the bot controlled NA and SA.
So what does the bot do? Does it attack orange, you know because he was the only real threat? Does it shore up it's boarders to protect it's bonuses? Does it try to take me out? Nope, it just attacks a single territory and then fortifies but leaves it's borders WIDE OPEN!
I traded in cards and had 12 men.....I cut through Orange, hoping that I'd get luck and the bot would actually attack Orange (dare to dream right?) ....Orange tries to take me out but can't so he takes Australia and Asia. He only has 3 troops at the border between NA and Asia, the bot has 8 troops....the border between Asia and Europe only has a few troops.
So the next turn the bot collects 12 troops and does the bot attack Asia to take away the bonus? Nope, even though the bot had an 8 to 3 troop advantage at the Asian/NA border....even though it had just gotten 12 men and could have plowed through Europe and into Asia it just attacked some random territory in Africa........then fucking PULLED 20 troops back in SA so it couldn't even attack with them!
I mean maybe I would have lost the game anyway but goddamn it's infuriating losing because of broken AI! And the reason there was a bot is because a player didn't confirm!
"I don't see coding wise how this could be possible" do you Eric? I mean AI that's this fucking bad and completely broken?
I hear you Justin. Apparently SMG thinks the AI is fine.
I've complained to them about it for but all you get are excuses.
The best "strategy" is to stay the hell away from the bot if it's aggressive. If someone bots out just get away from them because as sure as shit they will start attacking everything around them.
There are apparently different "personalities" programmed into the bots which is why some just sit there doing nothing and others will attack everything in sight. They're all really really really dumb though and they fuck up games all the time.
Hey Eric, my "rational explanation" is the AI is fucking broke and awful.
He probably hasn't played enough to understand the "personalities" right? Or that when an AI is near you you either have to kill it or get the hell away because it won't try to conquer territories.....it won't show any tactical sense.......it won't make any strategic moves.....it will just attack whoever the hell is nearest.
Oh...wait.....unless it's "personality" is timid then it just sits there fortifying every turn and letting players do what they want. I love those bots.
How many people do you need to complain about how terrible the AI is before you quit acting like it's not a huge issue?
The AI is broken and it ruins games. There's your "rational explanation".
Now cue the excuses for why a game people PAY for that is 5 years old still has completely broken AI.
So what is your rational explanation for this phenomenon? That the AI disproportionately attacks specifically you in games? I don't see how this could coding-wise be possible.
Justin