If a person leaves for whatever reason, they should not be replaced by AI. It spoils the game by
1. Unable to attack a player because you have to go through a AI, weaken you and cant make a affective attack on your attend player which inturn allows them to fortify when awarded continent occupied troops.
2. Al 's never attact a stronger player, allways goes after the weakest player, when games only has 3 players left, it almost becomes 2 against 1.
I've used this to my advantage, but does feel like a true win, when it happens to me it very frustrating especially if the game been going on for a while.
So what would you suggest as a replacement? I don't see a better alternative. Should the game just end?
J
Jason Wren
said
almost 8 years ago
No. The game continues. If a player does not play when it there turn, nothing happens if they don't play a second time they get disconnected and the game go on with no adding of troops to there territory untill there defeated.
1 person likes this
M
Maxumus
said
almost 8 years ago
1. Because you have to attack through an AI? But what about the player that was already there?
2.I've played many games were I have only been hanging on by a thread an AIs completely ignore me. Maybe ou have just been unlucky
J
Jason Wren
said
almost 8 years ago
Yes, it works both ways you can use the Al tactics to youe advantage but it spoils the game..
A
Aitch
said
over 7 years ago
True - Bots replacing a human player does ruin a game... either leaving the players troops as they are, or knocking them down to 1 would be better
Jason Wren
2 people like this idea