In this scenario, Axemansa, what happens to all their remaining troops and territories?
S
Samh
said
almost 8 years ago
I think Axemansa is talking about a one v one when all other players have been defeated. You can always leave the game, but I'm not sure if you them receive the same amount of points
A
Axemansa
said
almost 8 years ago
That's correct. Surrendering at the end when it's 1v1. For example, today I had 7 troops left on three countries with no cards to turn in. I was facing an army of 34. No sense in prolonging the inevitable. Surrendering is common in warfare so you should include this option to speed up play at the end.
4 people like this
T
TeathLobster
said
almost 8 years ago
You basically have this now. If you tap the home button you can forfeit the game.
1 person likes this
B
Briand
said
almost 8 years ago
You can't friend people after if you don't want for the end of the game.
G
Geno leone
said
almost 8 years ago
Totally want see my opponent wave the surrender flag!!!!
4 people like this
Michel Lemieux
said
almost 8 years ago
This could work on all scenarios as well, if a player surrenders while there as still 4 players in the game,it would only means that a bot would take his/her place and from now on ONLY place reinforcements troops on remaining territories. Those will have to be eventually won over by another player (unless there are only 2 players left in which case the game ends).
The surrendering player's rank is calculated based on his/her time of surrendering. Also, players should not have to wait the full length of the turn timer for the bot to place the troops since there would not be any ATTACK or FORTIFY phases.
T
Taylor Watson
said
almost 8 years ago
OR, should you surrender mid-game, your territories are greyed out and your troops remain as rebels. No bot would take your turns. This would require players to defeat the remaining army.
I personally find it very irritating when someone backs me into a corner but refuses to end the game.
2 people like this
B
Briand
said
almost 8 years ago
I've seen the computer get stuck and do this. It'll just hoard troops and never attack. I'm not personally a fan of this option. I want the computer to be fully functional and preferably smarter than it currently is. I've noticed it will actually push to take continents now but it won't defeat players when it totally can. The old sega risk game had a much more intelligent computer than the one that this game has. I hate it when people leave before they are definitely dead.
T
Taylor Watson
said
almost 8 years ago
Briand, if the surrender worked as I suggested above, no computer would take over. Troops wouldn't be hoarded.
G
GSC
said
over 7 years ago
Surrender either to end a game that is basically one sided and move on. Only a defiant person would stay to the end anyway. With multiple players a surrendering player should choose who he wants to surrender to. Could turn a tide in the opposite direction of a game. Kind of like an alliance but you only get to turn over control of your territories and are out. If the spectator option is put in that could be a fun option.
2 people like this
Joel K. Janzen
said
about 7 years ago
Just a suggestion. If you surrender, your score would not go down as much as if you had lost.
1 person likes this
Team @ SMG
said
about 7 years ago
@Joel Unfortunately that would likely be very abusable unless it was only for very specific circumstances.
Axemansa
HOW TO VOTE FOR THIS FEATURE? Tap the 'Do you like this idea?' below
34 people like this idea